From $2,000 a Year to a Six-Figure Head Start

In my previous post, I wrote about the new SG Child Support Package announced at National Day Rally 2026, and how I have never touched a single dollar of the Baby Bonus Cash Gift my kids received. Every dollar went into ES3, the SPDR Straits Times Index ETF, and was left alone to grow. Today my kids, ages one and three, are sitting on a combined 7,200 shares.

That post got me thinking further. The new $2,000 Child Credits, paid annually per child from age one to sixteen, is not a one-time gift like the Baby Bonus. It is fifteen to sixteen separate payments, arriving every single year like clockwork. So I did a calculation and simulation of my children's portfolio, to see what this could actually turn into if I kept doing exactly what I have been doing.

Setting the Assumptions

I did not want to build a fantasy projection based on the best years of the stock market. I wanted something conservative, a safe margin, so I used these numbers:

  • Starting point: 7,200 shares, current ES3 price around $5.77
  • Price appreciation of average 4 percent a year, a conservative estimate for ES3's long term capital growth
  • Dividend yield of 3.5 percent a year, fully reinvested into new shares every year
  • No Child Credit in 2026 itself, since the scheme only starts disbursing from 2027
  • My older child, age three in 2026, receives $2,000 a year from 2027 until age sixteen, which is fourteen payments
  • My younger child, age one in 2026, receives $2,000 a year from 2027 until age sixteen, which is sixteen payments
  • Every dollar, whether from dividends or Child Credits, goes straight back into buying more ES3

What the Simulation Showed

The results surprised me, not because any single year looked dramatic, but because of how steadily the number climbed.

2026 itself sees no Child Credit at all, since the scheme only starts paying out from 2027. In that first year, the portfolio simply grows from dividend reinvestment, moving from 7,200 shares to roughly 7,450 shares. But once 2027 arrives and the annual payments begin, the pace picks up. By 2032, six years into the scheme, the combined holding reaches roughly 15,100 shares, worth around $110,500. By 2040, when my older child's Child Credits run out at age sixteen, the portfolio sits at roughly 24,100 shares. And by 2042, when my younger child's final Child Credit lands, the combined holding reaches close to 26,200 shares, worth an estimated $283,600.

That is the portfolio growing from $41,500 today to nearly $284,000 over sixteen years, without me adding a single extra dollar beyond what the government already gives.

What Happens If I Just Leave It Alone

Then I asked myself a different question. What if I stop adding fresh money entirely after the Child Credits end, and simply let the dividends keep reinvesting on their own until 2046?

The answer is that the portfolio keeps climbing, just at a gentler slope. By 2046, twenty years from today, the combined holding reaches approximately 26,900 shares, worth an estimated $340,000. My kids would be in their early twenties by then, likely starting careers, maybe starting families of their own, and there would be a fund quietly waiting for them that neither of them had to build a single cent of themselves.

Adding the Angbao Money

There was one more variable I wanted to test. Every Chinese New Year, my kids receive angbao money, and a portion of it has always gone into their ES3 holdings as well. So I ran the simulation again, this time adding an extra $2,000 a year from angbao money, starting in 2027 and running for six years until 2032, on top of everything else already in the model.

The difference surprised me more than I expected. By 2032, the combined holding reaches roughly 15,133 shares instead of 13,000, worth about $110,500 instead of $97,100. That six-year window of extra contributions, totaling just $12,000 in nominal terms, adds far more than $12,000 of value by the time 2046 arrives.

By 2046, the version with the angbao fund reaches approximately 30,101 shares, worth an estimated $380,700, compared to 26,879 shares and $339,900 without it. That is a difference of roughly 3,200 extra shares and about $40,800 in extra value, generated from only $12,000 of additional money contributed fourteen years earlier.

The lesson here is not really about angbao money specifically. It is about timing. Money added early has more years to compound than money added later, even if the total amount contributed is identical. Six years of an extra $2,000 starting in 2027 outperforms the same $12,000 added as a lump sum closer to 2046, simply because it had more time to grow quietly in the background.

The Honest Caveats

I want to be upfront about something. This is a projection, not a promise. A 4 percent price growth and 3.5 percent yield are reasonable long run assumptions for the Straits Times Index, but no single year moves in a straight line. Markets rise and fall. Twenty years is long enough that even a small change in assumed returns can swing the final number meaningfully in either direction. These figures are also in nominal dollars, not adjusted for inflation, so the real purchasing power two decades from now will be somewhat less than the number on paper. I am not a financial advisor, and this should be read as an illustration of what disciplined reinvestment can do over time, not a guarantee or a recommendation.

Why This Matters More Than the Number

What strikes me most is not the $380,700 figure itself. It is the mechanism behind it. None of this required me to be a skilled investor, or to time any market, or to take on any real risk beyond holding a diversified index. It required exactly two things. Do not spend the money that was never meant to be spent. And leave it alone long enough for time to do the rest.

I think back to the intern I mentored, born in 2008, starting her working life with nothing behind her except her own effort, the same way I did, the same way most people do. My kids will not start from that same blank page. They will start from a position quietly built for them over eighteen years, one Baby Bonus and one Child Credit at a time, without them ever having to lift a finger for it.

If there is one thing this simulation confirmed for me, it is that the biggest gift in the new National Day Rally package was never really the $70,000 headline number. It was the fifteen years of consistency the policy quietly demands of parents willing to leave the money untouched.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The "Freedom" You Think a Business Will Give You Doesn't Exist Yet

Every week, someone tells me they're done with their 9-to-5 and ready to "start a business for the freedom." I understand the impulse. I've felt it myself. But there's a costly misunderstanding hiding inside that sentence, and it's worth naming before anyone quits their job over it. The story people tell themselves The logic usually goes like this: my job controls my time, so removing the job will give my time back. It's a clean story. It puts the blame on the employer, not on the nature of work itself, and it makes the solution feel obvious, become your own boss, and freedom follows automatically. It's also, for almost everyone, wrong. What a paycheck actually buys you When you're employed, you trade a fixed number of hours for a fixed paycheck. It's not a great deal in a lot of ways, but it has one underrated feature: a boundary. Outside your working hours, the job , mostly, leaves you alone. Start a business and that boundary is...
Read more

Why Do I Want to Give My Sons a Lump Sum at 21 and 23 in 2046

Some people have asked why I'm planning to let my sons access their investment portfolios when they're 21 and 23. The answer is simple: it's their money, not mine. As parents, we won't be around forever. Our job isn't just to provide for our children while they're young, but also to prepare them to stand on their own two feet. Based on the AI simulation I shared previously, if everything goes reasonably well, each of them could have a portfolio worth around S$130,000 by the time they're adults. I already know what some people will say: "S$130,000 won't be worth much in 2046." They're not wrong. Inflation is real. But if we use Singapore's historical inflation rate as a guide, S$130,000 in 2046 could have purchasing power similar to about S$70,000 today . That's still a meaningful amount of money. Ask yourself this: if your parents had handed you S$70,000 when you turned 21, would it have changed the choices available to you? For ma...
Read more

Am I a Bad Husband and Father for Wanting to Hustle Hard for My Family’s Future?

I currently work a standard day job from 8:30am to 5:30pm. I arrive on time and leave on the dot. I don’t entertain colleagues or clients outside of working hours, and I don’t make an effort to socialize at work because we’re simply on different wavelengths. To me, this is just a job. I dislike the work culture, though not the job itself. In fact, my role allows me to move around and meet clients instead of being deskbound, which gives me flexibility and time to think. Financially, the job pays well, but to me, it still feels insufficient. My Motivation: Financial Freedom for My Family My goal is simple: I want to earn enough so that my wife no longer needs to work. I want her to be a stay-at-home mother, not one burdened by household chores, since we already have a helper, but someone who can enjoy her life. I want her to be able to attend yoga or Pilates during the day, take naps if she needs to, and have the energy to be present for the kids in the evenings. I want this because ...
Read more